Depression and the Wish for Death in the Terminally Ill
A paper by South Australian psychiatrist, Frank
Weston
In recent medical literature several authors have expressed the views
that many terminally ill patients are depressed or suicidal. Depressed
patients may be irrational. Doctors can miss the presence of depression
and so not realise that these patients need special management. Such views
have serious implications which need to be looked at carefully especially
since some of these patients ask their doctors to hasten their death. If
voluntary euthanasia were to become legal the matter would become increasingly
important. There is considerable confusion about these matters which needs
to be clarified.
The diagnosis of depression
Winton and Pollard, in a letter to the editor of the Medical Journal of
Australia, express the view that there is a "close association between
suicide and mental disorder"(1). They refer to a study by Brown et al.
in which "every terminally ill patient who desired death was found to be
suffering from clinically depressive illness"(2). Yale Kamisar is concerned
about the same matter and writes, "There is considerable authority for
the view that suicide rarely occurs in the absence of a major psychiatric
disorder"(3). Breitbart considers most cancer patients who are suicidal
have a psychiatric disorder and "approximately 25% of all cancer patients
experience severe depressive symptoms," with about "6% fulfilling DSM III
criteria for the diagnosis of major depression"(4). Bukberg et al. found
that 42 per cent of the cancer patients they studied had "major depression"
and another 14 per cent had depressive symptoms(5).
To understand what is being described we would need to know what these
authors mean by 'depression'.
Several diagnostic schedules for 'depression' are available but perhaps
the best way to ascertain what is meant by the word is to refer to the
widely accepted diagnostic text, the DSM III R(6). This text gives only
two categories for depression which are relevant to a situation involving
terminally ill patients who do not have significant intellectual deterioration.
One of these is the 'Major Depressive Episode' or 'Major Depression'.
The DSM sets out groups of symptoms necessary for patients to qualify for
this diagnosis. To qualify patients would, 'during the same two-week period',
need only to have the five following symptoms 'nearly every day': 'depressed
mood'; loss of 'interest or pleasure' in 'almost all' 'activities'; 'decrease'
in 'appetite'; 'insomnia or hypersomnia'; and 'fatigue or loss of energy'.
Other symptoms could also be present, such as 'feelings of worthlessness',
but they would not be necessary to qualify for the diagnosis - the ones
stated would be sufficient.
If 'recurrent suicidal ideation', another symptom the DSM uses to qualify
for the diagnosis, is also present, as it inevitably will be in a patient
who is asking a doctor for help to die, one can see that a high proportion
of terminally ill patients who want to die may well be diagnosed as having
a 'Major Depression'. It is easy to see how Brown et al. could consider
that 25 per cent of the 44 terminally ill patients in their study had severe
depression and note three other studies showing 23 to 58 per cent of cancer
patients as having depression.
The DSM III R indicates, however, that symptoms clearly due to a physical
condition should not be included for the diagnosis of a 'Major Depressive
Episode'. If such symptoms were excluded, possibly very few of the patients
under consideration would qualify for the diagnosis. Even patients with;
'depressed mood'; 'feelings of worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate
guilt'; 'diminished ability to think or concentrate'; and 'recurrent suicidal
ideation', would not qualify under the DSM unless they had other symptoms
as well, and these might have to be excluded as due only to physical illness.
The second possible DSM III R diagnosis of 'depression', 'Adjustment
Disorder with Depressed Mood', can be applied 'when the predominant manifestation
is symptoms such as depressed mood, tearfulness, and feelings of hopelessness'
are present, and if the condition is part of a maladaptive reaction to
a 'psychosocial stressor' indicated by 'symptoms that are in excess of
a normal and expectable reaction'. Derogatis et al. state that 12 per cent
of the 215 cancer patients they studied fell into this diagnosis(7). Breitbart
indicates that more than half the "suicidal cancer patients" he reviewed
"had an adjustment disorder, usually with depressed or anxious and depressed
mood".
Patients may be incurably ill, suffer from unrelieved distress due to
the many possible stresses which can be present, and wish to die; but whether
they fall within the diagnosis 'Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood'
depends on what the doctor making the diagnosis considers to be a normal
or expectable reaction. Doctors who consider a wish to die as abnormal
or an excessive reaction to any psychosocial stress will be able to make
this diagnosis almost every time.
It can be seen that making the diagnosis of depression in terminally
ill patients according to DSM III R can be uncertain. Diagnosis will depend
considerably on how the doctor interprets the situation and assesses individual
factors. These ambiguities are enough to account for the wide range, 6
to 58 percent or more, reported for the presence of `depression' in terminally
ill patients. Generalisation and statistics have their uses but it is the
state of mind of each individual patient which is of prime importance in
a clinicial situation.
Are depressed patients of unsound mind?
A diagnosis of depression would not be so serious were it not for the assumption
that it implies the presence of unsoundness of mind. Conwell and Caine
write "determination of a suicidal patient's rationality can be no more
than a speculation".
Some terminally ill patients, in emotional distress, suffering loss
of dignity or independence, or whose physical symptoms or pain cannot be
relieved are very likely to be `depressed' - as most people lay or medical
understand and regularly use the term. Some of these patients will also
be wishing to die - mostly not because they are depressed but because their
situation is desperate in the presence of intolerable distress.
Many of them could be described as having a 'Major Depression' or an
'Adjustment Reaction with Depressed Mood' but this does not mean that they
do not have a rational basis for wanting to die or that they are of unsound
mind. Only if the wish for death is not congruent with the life situation,
or if there is evidence of psychosis such as delusions, distortions of
reality or hallucinations, or if thought is disconnected, should patients
be considered as being of unsound mind. Bukberg et al., despite finding
that 42 per cent of the patients they studied had major depressions, indicate
that not one of them had "psychotic depressive symptoms". Two of their
patients with histories of major depressions "spontaneously remarked" that
their current depressions were unlike those previously experienced.
Most ordinary citizens can detect if a person's thought is so irrational
or inappropriate that the person can be considered as being of unsound
mind. If voluntary euthanasia were legal it would be unlikely that doctors
would fail to notice that their patients were of unsound mind. The consequences
of the doctors' decisions would be profound and subject to legal scrutiny
which would focus their attention on the area. Most patients of unsound
mind would be readily enough detected. In a few doubtful cases psychiatric
consultation could be required.
Many doctors currently prescribe opiates to relieve pain even when they
know that death may be hastened due to the large dosage sometimes required.
These doctors believe they can tell when patients are of sound mind and
truthful in their complaints of continuing pain, although a patient could
be seeking more opiates as the only way to achieve death. If voluntary
euthanasia were legal doctors should be able to recognise genuine and rational
requests.
Do doctors miss depression in their patients?
Conwell and Caine also consider that "doctors on the front lines....are
ill equipped to assess the presence and effect of depressive illness in
older patients"(3). Kamisar also states that there is a "failure of primary
physicians to detect major depressions in their patients." Doctors may
miss depression in their patients but in the euthanasia situation they
would be alerted to the possible presence of depression because the patient
expresses the wish to die. If voluntary euthanasia were legal a doctor
wishing to provide euthanasia, and at the same time comply with the law,
would have to explore the patient's mental and physical situation in detail.
The request for aid would have to be repeated over a period of time and
be documented. Discussions with attending nurses and the patient's family
would be likely, and the opinion of another doctor required. In any uncertainty
regarding a depression the doctor could be expected to seek specialist
advice. It is unlikely that a doctor would miss depression in such circumstances.
Do doctors manage depression adequately?
Treatment for depression in the terminally ill may consist of providing
counselling, support, appropriate medical and nursing management and alerting
relatives to the patient's needs - standard palliative care proceedures.
In some, probably very few, cases it would be appropriate, with the patient's
consent, to administer antidepressant medication. It is known that doctors
who make the diagnosis of a significant depression for which medication
could be appropriate may prescribe an inadequate dosage. In a legal euthanasia
setting, however, doctors are likely to give recommended dosage up to the
maximum tolerated. A doctor seriously considering euthanasia and uncertain
about treatment for a depression, or any other medical condition present,
is likely to seek specialist advice, if only as a medico-legal safeguard.
Conclusion
The current situation is a risky one for both patients and doctors since
doctors who decide it is in their patient's best interests to meet requests
for euthanasia must at present act illegally. Since there are no legal
requirements to be met, acts of euthanasia are almost invariably hidden
and the doctor cannot assess many considerations important for the patient.
Legal voluntary euthanasia would be less risky for patients and doctors,
since a doctor who helped a patient to die would have to notify an overseeing
authority, such as a medical or government board, and state what medical
conditions were present and what treatments undertaken. Any significant
depression present would have to be documented. Any doctor acting within
the required guidelines would be protected by the law and the needs of
the patient would be adequately assessed.
The presence of depression or a request for death in a terminally ill
patient does not imply that a patient is of unsound mind or that medical
mismanagement is likely to occur. If a patient is of sound mind the presence
of depression should not preclude the provision of voluntary euthanasia.
Frank Weston, BA MB BS DPM FRANZCP
Adelaide, October 1996
References
-
Winton R, Pollard B, in reply to letter to the editor, Why doctors and
nurses must not kill patients. Med J Aust 1993;159:142.
-
Brown J H, Henteleff P, Barakat S, Rowe C J. Is it normal for terminally
ill patients to desire death? Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143:208-211.
-
Kamisar Y. Are laws against assisted suicide unconstitutional? Hastings
Center Report 23, no. 3 1993:32-41.
-
Breitbart W . Suicide in cancer patients. Oncology 1987; 1:49-54.
-
Bukberg J, Penman D, Holland J C. Depression in hospitalised cancer patients.
Psychosomatic Medicine 1984; 46:199-212.
-
American Psychiatric Association : Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric
Association. 1987;222,331. (A later version of this publication is now
available.)
-
Derogatis L R, Morrow G R, Fetting J, Penman D, Piasetsky S, Schmale A
M. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. JAMA
1983; 249:751-75.
-
Conwell Y, Caine E. Rational suicide and the right to die: Reality and
myth. NEG 1991; 325:1100-1102.
|
|