The VE Bulletin Excerpts
'No
price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself' Rudyard
Kipling
Vol 18: No 2 July 2001
2001 Annual General Meeting:
President's report
It is with pleasure that I present my eighth and final
report. It is certainly with a sense of relief that I am able to 'hand
over the reins' to Frances Coombe. Frances has been vice president for
several years so it is with complete confidence that I pass that responsibility
to her and will now assume the role of vice president. I was able to undertake
the President's role for so long and remain at the same time as President
of the World Federation only because of the help, support and caring which
I knew I would receive from the committee, to which there will now be some
changes. We have not really said goodbye to Bill Mettyear and Eric
Gargett, for although they have left the committee, they are still remaining
on the Task Force, a decision for which we are both relieved and grateful.
This role is a 'brain storming' one, bringing ideas to the committee for
consideration.
Unfortunately our minutes secretary, Margaret Deacon,
was unable to re-nominate and leaves with our thanks and best wishes. We
now warmly welcome Lesley Harriss to the role. Our award winning web-site
is now in the expert hands of former committee member Brenda Aynsley who
answered our call in the VE Bulletin.
Before I started to write my report I looked at all the
VE
Bulletins, right back to 1984, for events of special mention. However
there were too many to contemplate. Of recent importance however is that
the Social Development Committee, which was given the brief by the Legislative
Council to consider the 'Levy Bill', made a disgraceful and irresponsible
report, which took scant regard of the bill. Instead it made glaringly
obvious suggestions about palliative care, and went so far as to deny colleagues
the right to discuss the bill, by not returning it to the floor of parliament.
This was a complete denial of the democratic rights of our individual representatives
in parliament, and thus our rights.
It bewilders and disheartens us that the 75% of citizens
who support voluntary euthanasia are so passive and accepting of such things.
Why is there no protest by people who live in a democracy? It can only
be put down to complete apathy, and it certainly makes our task harder
as it plays right into the hands of our opponents who maintain there is
no will for change in the community. The answer my friends is not 'blowin'
in the wind' but squarely in your court. We hope that you will 'pull out
all stops' to support the bill, as we can be sure that the MPs will be
inundated with letters against it.
Seven years ago our guest speaker at our 10th
anniversary was Professor Helga Kuhse who predicted that in ten years time
there would be a voluntary euthanasia bill enacted somewhere nationally
or internationally. As you know, we had the 'Quirke Bill' in 1995. At the
same time the NT Rights of the Terminally Ill
Act was proclaimed,
only to be overturned by the Christian Coalition, aided and abetted by
Federal Parliament.
Next came the 'Levy Bill', then Oregon became the first
state in the USA to legalise physician- assisted suicide for terminally
ill people. Many who got the drugs did not need to use them, as their dying
process was acceptable to them. There is no evidence of abuse or difficulty
and the deaths were quick and peaceful. The Swiss continue in their own
quiet way to allow assisted suicide, which has been permitted for over
one hundred years. This year has seen voluntary euthanasia legalised in
the Netherlands, and in Belgium a bill is making it way slowly through
parliament. Ian Cohen a Greens Senator in NSW has announced that he will
introduce a voluntary euthanasia bill very soon, while Norm Kelly, a WA
Democrat who was to re-present his bill, lost his seat at the last election.
With the advent of the Dignity in Dying Bill 2001
we decided to again contact the AMA at federal and state level concerning
their inconsistent stance on therapeutic abortion and voluntary euthanasia.
All we ask for is that doctors be able to make their own decisions together
with their patients, in the best interest of their patients.
While there is still much work to be done it is with a
glimmer of hope for the future that I conclude my final report.
This is an edited version of a report presented by
Mary Gallnor at the March 2001 AGM
|