SAVES is not affiliated with Exit International / Dr Philip Nitschke and opposes the public availability of a 'peaceful pill'.


Quotes

ve logoSouth Australian Voluntary Euthanasia Society (SAVES)
The VE Bulletin Excerpts
'No price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself' Rudyard Kipling
Vol 19: No 2 July 2002

The Netherlands | Belgium | England | Hawaii
World News The Netherlands A Dutch Church spokesman has confirmed a bishop's remarks that the Catholic Church cannot give religious burials to people who planned to choose the legal option of voluntary euthanasia.

A spokesman, Micheil Savelsbergh, said the Dutch bishops were also completing pastoral guidelines for priests who deal with such cases. In an interview with Catholic News Service, Mr Savelsbergh said church funerals could be given to people who already had died from voluntary euthanasia, but not for patients whose deaths still were being planned that way.

 Mr Savelsbergh claimed 'The Church doesn't refuse funerals willingly - it normally does so only when someone has long publicly distanced himself from religion,' the spokesman added. 'But we defend life and believe it lies in the hands of God, not of people. We believe, with the whole Catholic Church, that euthanasia is absolutely wrong'.

He was speaking after a statement by Bishop Antonius Hurkmans defended a decision by two local priests to refuse a Catholic burial to a woman who had made a decision to seek voluntary euthanasia, while also seeking a role for the church in her funeral.

Based on an article 'Ban on euthanasia funerals' in The Catholic Leader, Brisbane, Sunday 3 March 2002  Belgium On May 16th the Belgian Parliament approved a bill allowing Belgium to be the second country in Europe to legalise the practice of allowing hopelessly ill patients the right to die, under limited conditions. The House of Representatives approved the bill 86-51, with 10 abstentions, while the Senate had already approved it last year. The vote largely reflected a split between the governing majority of Liberals, Socialists and Greens, and the opposition Christian Democrats and right-wing parties.

"This is a text reflecting freedom. Nothing is imposed," said Socialist Thierry Giet in defence of the law. The Christian Democrats immediately vowed to challenge the law in court. The vote followed two years of parliamentary debate. Currently only the Netherlands permits voluntary euthanasia.

The bill defined euthanasia as 'an act practised by a third party, intentionally ending the life of a person at his request.' Only patients who have reached the legal adult age may access the bill, after specific, voluntary and repeated request. A patient seeking euthanasia must be in a hopeless medical situation and be constantly suffering physically or psychologically, the measure says. If the person is not in the terminal phase of his illness, his doctor must consult with a second doctor, either a psychiatrist or a specialist in the disease concerned. At least one month must pass between the written request and carrying out the act.

Based on an article by Raf Casert in the 'Times of London' and forwarded by Deliverance News Service.

Also in Belgium - the Belgium Free University in Brussels is planning to teach medical students how to respond in the most professional way to requests for euthanasia. This is so doctors are properly trained, now that there has been a change in the law. Professor Wim Betz of the University's Dept of Medicine said that it is vital that the procedures are properly understood. The course covers the legal, medical and ethical aspects of voluntary euthanasia.

Based on information from Exit Newsletter Vol 22 no 1 March 2002

England

The late Ms Dianne Pretty, terminally ill and possibly with only weeks to live, was forced to allow motor-neurone disease to take its full course. This was after losing her last legal struggle to end her life with her husband's help. After a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights, Dianne Pretty spoke through her electronic voice synthesizer: 'The law has taken my rights away.'

Mrs Pretty, 43, a mother of two children who was paralysed from the neck down, failed to win the backing of the European Court to be allowed to 'die with dignity' at a time of her choosing. Her lawyers had argued that the right to life in the European Convention on Human Rights also implied a right to die. However she decided not to pursue the legal battle to a Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights. Mr Pretty had also said that he would not assist his wife's death illegally. She went to the court in Strasbourg after failing to gain assurance that her husband would not be prosecuted if he assisted her to die. Suicide is not a crime in Britain, however assisted suicide is punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Mrs Pretty's illness was so advanced that she could not take her own life without assistance.

The European Court judges ruled: 'To seek to build into the law an exemption for those judged to be incapable of committing suicide would seriously undermine the protection of life, which the 1961 Suicide Act was intended to safeguard, and greatly increase the risk of abuse. 'Her solicitor, Mona Arshi, of the human rights group Liberty, claimed 'Her fight should not be in vain, nor should it be forgotten.' Ninety per cent of British people backed such a change in the law, she said.

The court's ruling was welcomed by the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship, which said that it accorded with 'common sense and the beliefs and feelings of the majority of people in the west'.

Mrs Pretty eventually met the death she so feared from respiratory failure.

Based on an article 'Diane Pretty loses battle for right to assisted suicide', by: Frances Gibb, Legal Editor The Times (UK) Tuesday April 30 2002,  

Hawaii

The Hawaii State Senate voted 14-11 on 2nd May to defeat a physician -assisted suicide law similar to one in Oregon, despite support for it by Governor Ben Cayetano.

This was after earlier approval of two bills to allow competent, terminally ill adults seek a doctor's assistance to die in the Hawaii House parliamentary chamber on 8thMarch. One bill approved a constitutional amendment allowing assisted suicide; the other detailed how the law would be implemented.

From AAP Friday March 8th and forwarded by Deliverance News Service.