SAVES is not affiliated with Exit International / Dr Philip Nitschke and opposes the public availability of a 'peaceful pill'.


Quotes

The VE Bulletin Excerpts
'No price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself' Rudyard Kipling
Vol 20: No 2 July 2003
Cannabis for painIn her book Cannabis and Cancer, Arthur’s Story (2001, Scribe Publications) Pauline Reilly tells how cannabis offered relief to her husband where other medication failed. From a debilitated 84 year-old with no appetite, he regained some vigor, 6 kg in weight and his sense of humour. This allowed him to enjoy a reasonable quality of life during his last six months of life. The necessary ingredients were incorporated into biscuits, as he was a non-smoker.

There has been an ongoing positive response to the book and, like the author, sufferers desperate for relief for themselves or others are prepared to break the law, While the result is generally good it does not work for everyone. Also an unfounded fear of overdosing may inhibit a good result. The biggest problem is supply, but the author cautions against the illicit street trade as a supply of ready-made biscuits is available if a medical certificate is provided.

The opponents of cannabis use concentrate on recreational use, and are obviously ignorant of research revealing its medical benefits as revealed in evidence on the web(www.gwpharm.com/news). In Canada there is now an Office of Cannabis Medical Access that approves the use of cannabis for terminal illness, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury and disease, cancer, AIDS/HIV, severe arthritis, epilepsy and for other serious medical conditions (medical declaration necessary).

Cannabis is grown under government supervision to supply patients. In Belgium, cannabis can be used legally to treat similar medical conditions, as well as for treatment of glaucoma and the nausea resulting from chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This softening of attitude is repeated throughout Europe and in the UK.

In Australia laws differ from state to state, with South Australia, ACT and the Northern Territory permitting personal use, with relaxed law enforcement in the other states; but nowhere is its use legalised. There is a fine line which few lawmakers wish to cross, but those such as Families and Friends of Drug Law Reform (ACT) Inc continue to press for legal clarification. Lobbying of politicians has received little more than predictable negative responses, even though the current Victorian government went to the last poll with a positive commitment to legalise cannabis use.

There is world-wide recognition that prohibition does not work, but instead encourages profiteering by illicit drug growers and places at legal risk those who gain relief from devastating illness. The author argues that if the opponents of cannabis spent some time with AIDS sufferers and the terminally ill who gain some relief from cannabis, they might perhaps concede 'there but for the grace of God go I', and take action. It is only by constant 'hammering' that we can change the law. Anything that can be done to alleviate distress ought to be done, not just by somebody else, but by all with compassion for those less fortunate. After all who knows when we may join them.

Based on the VESV REPORT November, 2002.

(NSW Premier Bob Carr has recently proposed a trial for the medical use of cannabis. SAVES will monitor the issue.- Ed)

Previous item | Back to Newletter Contents | Next Item