|
The following article is from the SAVES newsletter, The
VE Bulletin, Vol 15 No 3, Nov 98
Philip Nitschke - Valiant Campaigner
The Federal Election is over with both major parties claiming success.
While their claims are not entirely without reason - Howard did not lose
office in spite of his GST proposals and Beazely has steered his party
to a strong position for the next election - of greater importance to readers
of this Newsletter is the low interest in voluntary euthanasia as a political
issue. Here was Philip Nitschke, pioneer doctor in implementing the Northern
Territory Rights of the Terminally Ill Act challenging Kevin Andrews, the
initiator of the legislation that overturned that Act, for his seat in
parliament. And yet it rated virtually no comment in the media outside
Victoria. Despite probably around 75% of Australians disapproving of what
Andrews and his supporters did in destroying the Act, Philip's challenge
was just not national news. Thus political realities continue to inhibit
the voluntary euthanasia movement.
Philip has an interesting background and in mounting his campaign for
the federal seat of Menzies, he announced:
"I have had a long history of fighting for social change within the
community. Although I am now a doctor, I originally trained as a physicist,
gaining a PhD in physics from South Australia, before travelling to the
Northern Territory to work with the Gurindji, the first Aboriginal group
in Australia to regain ownership of their land. This was followed by several
years with National Parks & Wildlife Authority in the Northern Territory
before moving to Melbourne. In my thirties, I decided to pursue a career
in medicine and graduated from Sydney University as a doctor in 1989, returning
to the Northern Territory to work... In recent years I have been involved
in issues as diverse as nuclear safeguard protocols, Aboriginal rights,
issues of free speech and censorship, and drug law reform. Recently, most
emphasis has been on the enactment and implementation of appropriate voluntary
euthanasia legislation so that suffering, terminally ill people could openly
ask for and receive help from their doctor to die when and how they choose."
Although Philip's challenge didn't spark the national debate that had
been hoped for, it did impact on Andrews. He started with a safe margin
of 11% and this was whittled down to around 2%. There were 8 candidates
and Philip gained around 9 % of the primary vote, a truly remarkable result
for a first time independent candidate.
The movement is fortunate to have attracted a valiant campaigner of
such dedication, determination and ability. Already his next initiative,
a clinic in Victoria for the terminally ill who regularly contact him Australia-wide
for assistance, has been announced.
|
|